top of page
  • Writer's pictureRobert Schuerger

Who's At-fault in Rear-end Truck Accidents in Dallas, Texas?

Rear-end collisions are one of the most common types of car accidents. They tend to happen when a trailing driver is following too closely and is unable to stop in time to avoid crashing into the front vehicle.

Such accidents usually result in major injuries and severe property damages - things can also go out of hand and lead to fatalities.

In Dallas, Texas, determining fault in a rear-end collision is complex, as several factors can contribute to the incident. The rear driver is primarily liable or at fault in a rear-end car accident. Schuerger Shunnarah Trial Attorneys can also advise on who's at fault in truck tire blowouts.

Generally, the rear driver is responsible for maintaining a safe distance from the vehicle ahead. If the motorist has broken brake lights or is driving too fast for the conditions, they are more likely to be guilty.

However, there are some cases where the lead driver may also be at fault in a rear-end collision. This is not as common as the other scenario, but it does happen from time to time.

If the lead driver, for example, suddenly brakes for no reason, or if they have malfunctioning brake lights, the trailing driver may not have enough time to react and stop.

In these situations, the front driver may share some of the responsibility for the rear-end accident. Truck drivers should rely on qualified Dallas truck accident lawyers for such complex cases.

Who Is Usually At Fault in a Rear-end Collision?

Who Is Usually At Fault in a Rear-end Collision?

Rear-end collisions usually happen when the rear driver doesn't pay proper attention to the road.

As a result, the rear driver's vehicle slams into the back of the lead vehicle. Since most rear-end accidents occur due to the rear driver's fault, the trailing motorist is primarily liable or guilty of the accident. This translates to the tailing driver being at fault.

However, there are some scenarios where the lead driver could be partially or fully liable. This usually involves the lead driver driving recklessly or having broken brake lights that lead to confusion on the road.

Other factors contributing to the fault in a rear-end collision are weather conditions or sudden stops by the vehicle ahead, leaving the trailing driver no time to brake.

Determining liability for a rear-end automobile accident can be a complicated process. In Texas, an at-fault state, road laws require the inculpated motorist to be responsible for injuries and property damages caused by the accident.

In any case, the at-fault driver (and no-fault automobilist) need to seek help from a car accident lawyer to protect their rights.

They have the knowledge and expertise to safeguard clients' interests and fight for maximum compensation following rear-end collisions.

Establishing Liability for Rear-end Collisions

Rear drivers are usually partially responsible for most rear-end collisions. However, front drivers may also be liable in some cases. One of the most critical aspects of this process is determining who is at fault for the rear-end accident.

In this situation, a car accident attorney can help the at-fault motorist (or the other driver) present their case to court with substantial evidence and gain maximum compensation from the other party.

1. Duty to Maintain a Safe Distance

All drivers have a duty to maintain a safe distance between their vehicle and the one in front of them. This means they should always be aware of their speed and road conditions and adjust their driving accordingly.

Automobilists following another vehicle too closely may not have enough time to stop if the front driver suddenly hits their brakes. This is one of the most common causes of multi-vehicle accidents, and motorists must take precautions to prevent it from happening.

2. Factors That Contribute to Rear-end Accidents

Establishing liability in a rear-end accident is complex and requires careful analysis of the circumstances leading up to the accident. Many factors can contribute to a rear-end crash, including:

It is the duty of both drivers, the one who rear-ended and the front driver, to drive safely at all times. Texting while operating a vehicle or talking to passengers without eyes on the road ahead can cause accidents.

4. Speeding

Intentionally speeding past the limit to overtake the trailing driver can result in the negligent driver being fully responsible for the auto accident.

5. Poor road conditions

It is crucial to consider road conditions when determining driver error. Adverse weather conditions, such as heavy rain or poor visibility from extreme hail storms, can result in a rear-end collision.

6. Brake checking

Suddenly slamming on the brakes (aka brake checking) is illegal and can result in the front driver being partially or fully liable for the rear-end accident.

Who Is at Fault - the Lead Driver or the Rear Driver?

Truck accidents can be devastating, leaving those involved feeling confused, angry, and potentially injured. One of the biggest concerns after a rear-end car accident is determining who is at fault.

In some cases, one driver may be entirely at fault for the accident. In other cases, both parties may share responsibility for the accident.

  • Contributory Negligence

In the context of personal injury law, fault is usually determined by looking at the concept of contributory negligence.

This refers to a situation where the lead driver and the rear driver contributed to the accident to some degree.

In this case, if Driver A is liable to any degree for the rear-end collision caused by Driver B, they will not receive compensation, regardless of having limited liability.

  • Comparative Negligence

Conversely, this doctrine allocates liability between the parties involved based on their percentage of fault. It can be split into two categories: pure comparative negligence and modified comparative negligence.

Pure comparative negligence means that liability is shared according to the percentage of fault.

Driver A, for example, can only collect $10,000 in accident damages if they are 30% to blame for the collision caused by driver B (70% to blame).

On the other hand, modified comparative negligence is a legal concept that determines liability based on the percentage of fault assigned to each party involved in an accident.

In such cases, a plaintiff's recovery of damages is barred once they meet or exceed a predetermined threshold of fault.

Such limits typically range from 50% to 51%. In other words, if an automobilist is more than 50% responsible for the accident, they will not be able to recover any damages from the other driver.

Types of Evidence Used to Prove Fault in a Rear-end Collision

Types of Evidence Used to Prove Fault in a Rear-end Collision

Rear-end crashes are among the most common car accidents on roads across the United States. They happen when the front of one vehicle crashes into the back of another car.

The severity of the impact depends on the speed of the rear car and the distance between the two vehicles.

In this case, a no-fault driver seeking maximum compensation from their insurance company will benefit from a personal injury lawsuit. However, proving the liability of the other driver is essential if the victim wants to recover damages.

  • Videos and Pictures of the Accident Scene

One of the most helpful types of evidence in rear-end collisions includes videos or pictures taken immediately after the accident occurred.

The visual proof can give a detailed view of the damage to both vehicles and reveal the car's position before and after the accident. These types of evidence can help the lawyers working on the personal injury lawsuit understand which vehicle driver made an error.

  • Braking, Distance, and Vehicle Speed Analysis

Calculating how fast the vehicles traveled during the incident and analyzing the braking distance can help determine fault in a car accident. It can be used to prove if the trailing driver had enough time to react and slow down before the crash.

  • Detailed Police Report

This is usually an official document that details the accident's events and helps the insurance company or law firm determine who is at fault.

Witnesses, drivers, and passengers' statements and car damage may be included in the report. If the police cited the rear car's driver, it could be evidence that they were at fault.

Final Words

Rear-end truck accidents in Dallas, Texas, happen more frequently than most people might think. Victims of such accidents face a daunting task; navigating the legal process to find out who is at fault and then fighting insurance companies to receive maximum compensation.

The situation is usually even more complex due to the size and weight of commercial trucks. On top of that, the accident can even lead to severe injuries and sometimes wrongful death if small passenger cars are involved.

According to the law, all drivers must keep adequate space between their car and the vehicle in front of them. This means that if the rear truck crashes into the car in front of them because they failed to apply their brakes in time, the driver of the rear vehicle is at fault. Contact Schuerger Shunnarah Trial Attorneys for other questions such as, "Who's at fault in spilled cargo accidents?"

However, there are situations where the lead car may assume some degree of fault, such as if they brake suddenly without cause without giving the rear vehicle enough time to react. In such cases, the front driver may be partially responsible for the accident.

To navigate the legal process successfully, victims must seek medical attention, file a police report, collect evidence, and contact a reliable law firm with experience handling rear-end truck accidents.

The team at Schuerger Shunnarah Trial Attorneys goes to war for their clients - giving victims the best chance of receiving the compensation they deserve.


bottom of page